Luis Campusano keeps the strikeouts in check — strikes out less often than 69% of qualified hitters. No real holes either — the weakest mark (walk rate) sits right around the league average. Early-season read — only 81 plate appearances so far.
Each spoke is a skill estimate adjusted for sample size — not raw season stats — so farther out = better.
Percentiles vs. 463 qualified hitters.
Data through 2026-07-15.
Plays like…
Same archetype, nearest by rate — the hitters whose profile looks most like this one.
Every plate appearance ends one of three ways: a strikeout (0 bases), a walk (1 base), or a ball in play worth its estimated bases.
The bar splits his value into those pieces, versus the league.
More bases is better. In the table, 100th percentile = best in MLB.
Ball-in-play basesWalk bases
Bases per plate appearance
.409
.123
Luis Campusano
.351
.084
League average
What a replacement bat would have done
over Luis Campusano's 81 plate appearances
43
Luis Campusano
29
Replacement level
▲ +14 bases above replacement (created 43 vs 29)
Luis Campusano
League
Percentile
Bases per ball in play(higher = better)
.662
.510
60th
Walk rate(higher = better)
12%
8%
48th
Strikeout rate(fewer = better)
25%
23%
69th
Platoon splits
Platoon splits (EB/PA)
Dot = shrunk true-talent estimate; bar = 89% credible interval.
Faint diamond = his raw, unshrunk rate against that hand — small samples make it noisy, which is why the model pulls the dot toward a more trustworthy estimate.
Shrunk splits beat raw splits decisively at low PA counts and converge with them as playing time builds — individual platoon gaps need roughly 1,000+ PA vs a hand before the raw number alone can be trusted.
Headline EB/PA (0.470)
vs LHP10 PA0.490
vs LHP: shrunk estimate 0.490 EB/PA, 89% credible interval 0.418 to 0.558, based on 10 plate appearances. Raw (unshrunk) rate: 0.200 EB/PA.
Raw vs LHP rate (0.200) is off this scale — small samples like this are exactly why the shrunk estimate (the dot) is the trustworthy number, not the raw one.
vs RHP71 PA0.460
vs RHP: shrunk estimate 0.460 EB/PA, 89% credible interval 0.396 to 0.526, based on 71 plate appearances. Raw (unshrunk) rate: 0.593 EB/PA.
Raw vs RHP rate (0.593) is off this scale — small samples like this are exactly why the shrunk estimate (the dot) is the trustworthy number, not the raw one.
0.3770.4270.4770.5280.578
0.029 EB/PA better vs LHP than vs RHP (shrunk estimate).
89% credible interval: -0.009 to +0.070
That interval crosses zero, so the model can’t confidently say which side he’s actually better against.
How he hits
Hits it to Pull most often, and does the most damage to Oppo.
Best batted balls
Where every ball Luis Campusano put in play landed this season.
Dots are colored by estimated bases (EB) — pale slate (easy out) to dark teal (home-run territory).
Filled dots are hits; hollow rings are outs — a dark ring in the outfield is a crushed ball that got caught.
Hover a dot or a row to link the two; click to watch on Baseball Savant.
